To What Extent Can Abu Nidal be Considered a Terrorist Group?

To what extent can Abu Nidal be considered a terrorist group?

Abu Nidal is a terrorist group that is good known for its wide onslaughts on western Palestinian and Israeli marks throughout the 1980’s. The significance of Abu Nidal is “father of the struggle” ; this is the assumed name for Sabri al-Banna who founded the organisation. It was founded when he split from the well-known Palestinian Liberation Organization ( PLO ) in 1974. This was because he accused the PLO of ‘selling out’ by negociating diplomatic dealingss with the province of Israel. They were seeking to destroy the diplomatic relationship with the PLO and the west community. Abu Nidal wants to extinguish the province of Israel as a Judaic province and do the constitution of a Palestinian province portion of the Arab faith. Abu Nidal has been on the United States of America’s terrorist list group for more than twenty old ages and in the mid 1980’s the terrorist group was considered as the most unsafe terrorist organisation in being. Abu Nidal had support from Iraq, Syria and Libya by giving the terrorist group preparation, support and guns. Iraq helped Abu Nidal by assailing Syria and PLO in 1983. Abu Nidal should be considered a terrorist group to a big extent because of their onslaughts to harm civilians, how they perform their onslaughts and their background. However they could be seen as a materialistic group

Abu Nidal organisations history and how it was formed by its leader Sabri al-Banna is of import in demoing that they are terrorists. Sabri al-Banna Born in 1937 in a household who lived in British- ruled Palestine. In 1948 there was an Arab- Israeli war and Banna and his household fled header towards the West bank. In two years’ clip Sabri al-Banna would fall in the Arab nationalist Baath party in 1950, by the clip 1967 came Sabri al-Banna would be involve with the PLO. Abu Nidal ( Sabri al-Banna ) was stand foring al-Asifa who was the dominant group of the PLO, which was led by Yasir Arafat. Abu Nidal left the PLO because of its proposed creative activity of national authorization in west bank and Gaza strip.Abu Nidal is a non-religious international terrorist organisation that was sponsored by Syria, Libya and Iraq. They have had terrorist operations on Western, Israeli and Arab marks. Abu Nidal has organized terrorist operations in 20 states, Killing about three hundred and wounding 100s of people. There are some experts that think Abu Nidal is inactive and I would hold because there has been no menace to the international community for many old ages now. Abu Nidal has different names for its ego like Fatah Revolutionary Council and Arab Revolutionary Brigades. Abu Nidal was looking at the programs that would travel the other manner of the PLO and this would make a high tenseness between the groups and some states. Throughout the history of the organisation they have been executing assorted onslaughts and working in concurrence with big graduated table groups such as the PLO.

Abu Nidal has had major and deathly panic onslaughts that have shocked the international community. The chief marks have been Israelis and PLO functionaries, besides westerners were marks until late 1980’s. In 1944 Abu Nidal assassinated the senior Jordanian diplomat named Naeb Imran Maaytah in Beirut, at 9:30am where a gunslinger shooting at the diplomat who was driving out the parking batch. Abu Nidal ne’er gave a ground but some said it happened because of the peace negotiations with Arab and Israeli but the international community knows that they did the onslaught because the peace negotiations would destroy their operation and organisation. On 27 December 1985 four gunslingers walked towards the El AL ( Israeli air hose ) to look into in at Rome’s international airdrome and merely opened fire on a crowd of people every bit good as throwing grenades. The decease toll was 13 people dead and 76 hurts. Abu Nidal didn’t ever have successful panic operations but there were ever some casualties in the panic events on civilians. It is apparent by measuring these events that they could be considered terrorists as they harmed people and transfuse a certain sum of fright into them.

Abu Nidal’s organisation purposes were to claim the province of Israel and have the state abolished ; the method they wanted was an international Arab revolution that supports an armed battle against the bosom of Israel. Israel was the resistance to all the environing states who formed the Arab League. Abu Nidal strongly resisted against peace dialogues between Arabs and Israelis. This opposition was throughout the United States, PLO, moderate Arab governments in Jordan, Egypt and Persian Gulf provinces. Abu Nidal has besides served as a materialistic force to extremist Arab governments but they would still be considered terrorist because of the panic attacks that they proceed to make in states. Abu Nidal likewise to the other states environing Israel were really strongly negative towards them, this is why they would execute onslaughts like this. Their menaces to Israel and how they want to take them out is because they discriminate against the Jews in Israel. SO their chief ground for their terrorist Acts of the Apostless are because of land and faith which are major grounds.

However Abu Nidal would be considered a soldier of fortune more than a terrorist because he would be contracted to a state or government to transport out lifelessly onslaughts. Iraq hired Abu Nidal to assail Syria to make struggle but this ended shortly due to the fact that USA would merely assist Iraq if they would halt support and utilize terrorist groups such as Abu Nidal and Iraq besides helped Abu Nidal organize his ain organisation, which subsequently attacked Syria and the PLO in 1983. Saddam Hussein expelled Abu Nidal and his group to seek and derive U.S. military support for Iraq’s war with Iran. Once the war ended Iraq continued to back up Abu Nidal, after being kicked out of Iraq the group moved to Syria, where it tried to sabotage the peace programs with Israel, Jordan and PLO. Syria subsequently besides kicked out Abu Nidal in 1987, due to U.S. force per unit area to distance themselves from terrorists. Libya so took in the organisation but in 1999 they tried to elate itself of international countenances doing Libya to be kicked out of the Abu Nidal organisation.

Abu Nidal is the most unsafe terrorist group known to the terrorist list that the U.S.A has on its system. Abu Nidal has had major and deathly panic onslaughts that have shocked the international community. The chief marks have been Israelis and PLO functionaries, every bit good as westerners were marks until late 1980’s. Abu Nidal strongly resisted against peace dialogues between Arab and Israeli. This opposition was throughout the United States, PLO ; moderate Arab governments in Jordan, Egypt and Persian Gulf provinces. They were trained by many states such as Iraq, Syria and Libya which helped the organisation acquire support and logistical support. Abu Nidal didn’t ever have successful panic operations but there were ever some casualties in the panic events. Abu Nidal was looking at the programs and would travel the other manner of the PLO and this would make a high tenseness between the groups and some states. Abu Nidal wanted to extinguish the province of Israel as a Judaic province and do the constitution of a Palestinian province. By looking at the onslaughts and how they were performed it is clear to see they are terrorists by harming civilians in terrorist onslaughts. Their history besides involved work with terrorist groups such as the PLO.