Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the effects of exposure


Magnetic resonance imagination ( MRI ) was first developed over thirty old ages ago ( Lauterbur 1973 ; Mansfield and Grannell 1973 ) . Since the early 1980s, MRI has become a widely used diagnostic tool in medical specialty, with a assortment of neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular and new interventional applications ( Schlenck 2005 ; Frese and Engels 2003 ) . MRI uses electromagnetic Fieldss ( EMFs ) in three frequence ranges: the inactive magnetic field ( 0 Hz ; typical magnitude of 1-3T ) , the time-varying magnetic field generated by imaging gradients ( 100-1000 Hz ; magnitude of 20 mT Garand rifle ) , and the radiofrequency ( RF ) field ( 10-100 MHz ; magnitude about 10 µT ) ( Keevil et al. 2005 ) . Over clip, MRI systems have been developed with progressively stronger inactive and gradient magnetic Fieldss, and more powerful RF transmittal spirals, doing the safety of both patients and staff members working with this equipment an issue of paramount importance ( Shellock and Crues 2004 ) .

There are three possible manners of exposure of both patients and workers to the inactive field: ( 1 ) exposure to a high strength field, when in near propinquity to the magnet ; ( 2 ) exposure to a spacial gradient field, whereby the field decreases with distance from the magnet ; and ( 3 ) exposure to a little time-varying field, if the single moves around in the spatially variable inactive field ( HPA 2008 ) . This inactive field is typically created utilizing a super-conducting magnet and is left on invariably, merely being switched off for care or in instance of exigency. In contrast, the switched gradient field is quickly pulsed on and off during scanning Sessionss which means that patients are exposed to big time-varying Fieldss. Similarly, the RF field besides exposes patients to quickly changing magnetic Fieldss. Exposure of workers to either time-varying gradient or RF Fieldss is non everyday and lone occurs if they have to stand near to the terminal of the dullard during an scrutiny ( Riches et al. 2007 ) .

In 2004, the European Union ( EU ) adopted the Physical Agents ( EMF ) Directive restricting occupational exposure to EMF ( EU 2004 ) . This Directive was based on counsel from both the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection ( ICNIRP 1998 ) and the National Radiological Protection Board ( NRPB 2004 ) , and was required to be adopted by all EU member provinces by April 2008. The Directive is intended to protect workers from inauspicious effects on the cardinal nervous system that may happen from exposure to EMFs. However, there is presently argument over whether the exposure limits within this Directive are based on sound scientific grounds.

This paper will reexamine the published literature on occupational wellness effects of exposure to both inactive and dynamic EMFs from MRI equipment, place any spreads in the bing research, and do recommendations for future research.

Literature reappraisal

A literature hunt was conducted utilizing the Pubmed electronic database. Search footings included, but were non limited, to magnetic resonance imagination OR MRI AND inactive OR time-varying OR occupational exposure OR peripheral nervus stimulation OR vestibular OR immune system OR reproductive OR cognitive.

Effectss of occupational exposure to inactive and time-varying magnetic Fieldss from MRI equipment

Exposure to both inactive and dynamic magnetic Fieldss from MRI equipment can ensue in a assortment of biological effects on organic structure tissues. There is hence a possibility that occupational exposure to magnetic Fieldss may hold inauspicious effects on human wellness. The findings of this literature reappraisal on the possible short- and long-run wellness effects of occupational exposure are discussed below.

Neurobehavioural public presentation and knowledge

There is a considerable organic structure of published research on the neurobehavioural and cognitive effects of exposure to magnetic Fieldss. A survey by de Vocht and co-workers ( 2006 ) assessed the relationship between exposure to inactive magnetic Fieldss and neurobehavioural effects in 20 voluntaries, after traveling their caputs in the absence of a magnetic field and in isolated magnetic Fieldss of 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Results showed a relationship between exposure and ocular and audile working memory, eye-hand coordination velocity and ocular perceptual experience, such that these responses were impaired with increasing exposure to the magnetic field. However, a restriction of this survey is that topics participated in pre-test pattern Sessionss, thereby fiting them with anterior cognition and accomplishments that may hold influenced the consequences observed.

A survey by the same research group investigated the impact of exposure to the isolated Fieldss of a whole-body 7T MRI scanner on the neurobehavioural public presentation and knowledge of 27 voluntaries ( de Vocht et Al. 2007 ) . Each voluntary was indiscriminately exposed to about 1600 meitnerium, 800 meitnerium and a negligible ( 2 meitnerium ) inactive field and so completed a trial measuring audile working memory, eye-hand coordination and ocular perceptual experience. Study findings showed that volunteers’ public presentation in a ocular trailing undertaking was significantly ( p & lt ; 0.01 ) impaired with increasing strength of magnetic field ( by 1.3 % per 100 meitnerium exposure ) , while a tendency towards decreased public presentation in two cognitive-motor trials with increasing field strength was besides observed. No effects of exposure on memory were observed. This survey concluded that there are effects on ocular perceptual experience and hand-eye coordination, but that these are weak. Furthermore, these effects may depend mostly on the time-varying Fieldss, instead than the inactive field. The major restriction of this survey was that it did non take into history that repeated head motion in the absence of a magnetic field may do giddiness or loss of spacial orientation or vestibule-ocular control mechanisms and that baseline values for these should hold been measured during the survey.

Peripheral nervus stimulation

Both musculus and nervus fibers respond to quickly altering electrical stimulation. The minimal electromotive force required for conductivity to happen varies, depending on the type of nervus or musculus membrane and conductivity is besides frequency dependant. Nerve stimulation will merely happen when the speed of the organic structure in the gradient field is greater than the membrane stimulation potency and is of a suited frequence ( Norton 2003 ) .

A figure of surveies have investigated peripheral nervus stimulation following exposure to magnetic Fieldss. An early survey in two voluntaries showed that exposure to a magnetic field gradient with a rate of alteration of dB/dT of 61 Thymine-1resulted in muscular vellications which were synchronal with gradient pulsations ( Cohen et al. 1999 ) . At dB/dT up to 66 Thymine-1, no alterations were noticeable by ECG. A subsequently survey by Bourland et Al. ( 1999 ) in 84 voluntaries showed that pulsed gradient magnetic Fieldss with frequences of about 1000 Hz and field strength of 15 Thymine-1were necessary to bring on peripheral nervus stimulation. In understanding with earlier surveies, experiments conducted in Canis familiariss showed that cardiac stimulation by pulsed magnetic gradient Fieldss was improbable to happen.

A recent survey by Glover and Bowtell ( 2008 ) investigated the initiation of electric Fieldss by organic structure motions of a individual voluntary in the periphery magnetic field of a 3T MRI whole organic structure scanner. Findingss demonstrated that a rate of alteration of the magnetic field ( dB/dt ) for natural organic structure rotary motions were about 1 Ts-1near to the terminal of the dullard. With fast, angular rotary motion of the caput, this rate increased to 20 Thymine-1, with no inauspicious effects reported. Based on these findings and those of earlier surveies, it is likely that natural organic structure motion will non bring on peripheral nervus stimulation.

Vestibular system

Vertigo has been experienced by some patients and workers both within and shut to MRI scanners. Proposed hypotheses for this include differences in magnetic susceptibleness between the vestibular variety meats and the environing fluid and the initiation of currents which act on vestibular hair cells ( Glover et al. 2007 ) . Glover et Al. ( 2007 ) reported the findings of a survey look intoing magnetic field-related dizziness in patients and workers in and around a whole organic structure MRI scanner. A sum of 80 % of topics experienced mild to severe giddiness when exposed to a magnetic field alteration of 4.7 T in 1.9 secs but no responses were reported undermentioned exposure to 50 MS pulsations of dB/dt 2 Thymine-1. This survey concluded that dizziness was non needfully related to a high rate of alteration of magnetic field.

A recent survey evaluated centripetal symptoms and vestibular map of six workers following exposure to a new 9.4T MRI scanner ( one of the most powerful presently available ) ( Patel et al. 2008 ) . Following a 30-minute exposure and at 3-month followup, no overall impairment in vestibular map was recorded, although higher incidences of tonic vestibular dissymmetry, hyper-reactive caloric responses, and self-generated nystagmus were observed, compared with the general population. This survey concluded that workers exposed to this new strong MRI experienced centripetal symptoms but findings were inconclusive over whether long-run vestibular harm occurs.


Magnetic Fieldss bring on electrical currents in any conducting medium, the size of which are relative to conduction and the rate of alteration of the magnetic field. Time-varying magnetic Fieldss can bring on magnetophosphenes, flashes of visible radiation induced when electric currents stimulate excitable cells in the retina. Surveies have shown that these light esthesiss can happen at a dB/dt of 1.5 Thymine-1, frequence 20–25 Hz ( Lovsund et al. 1980 ) . The consequence disappears when the time-varying gradient ceases and normal caput motions are excessively slow to bring on an consequence, although rapid oculus motion can bring forth ocular stimulation. Other than possible distraction, the occupational wellness hazards associated with magnetophosphenes are non yet known and necessitate farther probe.

Metallic gustatory sensation

An acidic or metallic gustatory sensation may be experienced by some people when traveling their caputs in a magnetic field since this motion can bring on the flow of currents within the oral cavity and the production of metallic ions in the spit. The way of the current may besides be modified by the dentitions and the lingua ( ICNIRP 2004 ) . Cavin et Al. ( 2007 ) performed a survey to characterize the metallic gustatory sensation experienced by persons when traveling about an MRI scanner. A sum of 21 participants performed controlled caput motions in the isolated field of a 7T scanner. Consequences showed that 12 topics experienced a metallic gustatory sensation ; 11 when they rotated their caputs horizontally and one if the caput was nodded. However, the threshold dB/dt value at which this was experienced varied greatly between topics, from 1.2–4.0 Thymine-1and was dependent on the way of motion. While this consequence was ephemeral, enduring for merely a few proceedingss, this could however be a distraction for workers.

Immune system

Limited surveies have investigated the effects of EMFs on the immune system. A survey was conducted by Tuschl et Al. ( 1999 ) to look into the consequence of occupational exposure to high frequence EMFs in a infirmary exposure limits well higher than those recommended in national guidelines were recorded. No important differences between open workers and control persons were observed in entire leukocyte and lymphocyte counts or in lymphocyte activity or proliferation. Furthermore, all immune parametric quantities measured were within the normal scope for all open persons.

A more recent survey investigated the effects of chronic exposure of six worlds to 0.2–6.6 µT magnetic field ( Bonhomme-Faivre et al. 2003 ) . Consequences showed reduced entire lymph cell and CD4 counts in open persons compared with control, and similar effects were besides observed in mice. Once exposure ceased, an increased in values was observed. Take together these findings suggest that short-run occupational exposure to magnetic Fieldss may non hold any inauspicious effects on the immune system although longer term chronic exposure may. Further research is needed to corroborate these preliminary findings.

Cellular and chemical reactions

Paramagnetic elements present within the human organic structure, e.g. Fe, Co and Cr are responsible for magneto-mechanical interactions. However, these are merely mildly effected by even strong magnetic Fieldss and are improbable to hold any damaging occupational wellness effects. It has been suggested that enzymes with radical-pair intermediates may be likely marks for magnetic field effects in worlds ( Taoka et al. 1997 ) . It is hypothesised that the of import measure in this mechanism is homolysis of a cobalt-carbon ( Co–C ) bond, therefore bring forthing a extremist brace dwelling of a 5’-deoxyadenosyl extremist and hazelnut ( II ) alamin ( AdoCbl ) . A magnetic field consequence has been demonstrated byin vitrosurveies utilizing ethanolamine ammonium hydroxide lyase ( Taoka et al. 1997 ) ; nevertheless, this consequence has yet to be demonstrated with human enzymes, since a survey affecting human methylmalonyl CoA mutase did non show any magnetic field consequence on this peculiar enzyme ( Taoka et al. 1997 ) .

Generative wellness

An epidemiological survey was conducted among female MRI workers in the United States utilizing a questionnaire designed to garner information on their generative position, work-related activities and possible confounders, such as age, smoke and intoxicant ingestion ( Kanal et Al. 1993 ) . Data showed that when gestations among MRI workers were compared with those in other professions, no important addition in inauspicious generative results associating to self-generated abortion, construct clip & gt ; 12 months, bringing before 39 hebdomads or low birth weight were observed in MRI workers. These findings suggest that MRI systems do non present a hazard to pregnant adult females.

Findingss of other reappraisals

[ Client: Ive included these as a separate subdivision since they detail findings on a assortment of wellness effects and canTs truly be included in a peculiar subdivision discussed antecedently ]

A figure of other reappraisals have besides been conducted which discuss the effects of occupational exposure to magnetic Fieldss. In 2006, the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) published a comprehensive reappraisal on inactive magnetic Fieldss. This concluded that much of research in this field had non been conducted in a systematic manner and lacked appropriate methodological analysis and exposure information ( WHO 2006 ) . More late, Franco et Al. ( 2008 ) conducted a reappraisal of the literature on occupational exposure to inactive magnetic Fieldss which was published after the WHO review. Findingss from surveies conducted on voluntaries showed that short-run exposure to inactive magnetic Fieldss induces a assortment of acute effects including: ( 1 ) dizziness, sickness and a metallic gustatory sensation in the mouth motion of the organic structure or caput ; ( 2 ) alterations in blood force per unit area and bosom rate, initiation of ectopic bosom beats and increased likeliness of reversible arrhythmia ; and ( 3 ) lessening in memory and hand-to-eye coordination. These findings are in understanding with the earlier findings of the NRPB that dizziness, sickness, metallic gustatory sensation and magnetophosphenes could wholly be induced through motion in inactive magnetic Fieldss & gt ; 2T, while these acute effects would non happen through exposure to inactive Fieldss & lt ; 2T ( NRPB 2004 ) .

Shellock and Crues ( 2004 ) reviewed the published literature on the biological effects of inactive and gradient magnetic Fieldss and concluded that exposure to inactive Fieldss has non harmful biological effects and any effects observed are improbable to be long lasting. However, the writers acknowledged that there is a deficiency of well-designed, carefully controlled surveies showing the safety of chronic exposure to magnetic Fieldss.

Decisions and recommendations for future research

The findings of this literature reexamine show that a scope of effects may be observed undermentioned exposure to magnetic Fieldss including cognitive, vestibular and immune effects and peripheral nervus stimulation. However, these effects are by and large non harmful and are improbable to be durable. The impact of these effects on workers public presentation nevertheless requires farther rating. A restriction of many surveies included in this reappraisal is that many of the surveies involve really little Numberss of human voluntaries ; therefore cautiousness should be taken when sing the decisions drawn from the survey findings. Further, these surveies merely investigated short-run exposure and considered short-run effects.

There is clearly an unmet demand for farther research to look into the short- and long-run effects of exposure to inactive and dynamic magnetic Fieldss, both through short- and long-run exposure. Merely when a organic structure of robust scientific informations are available can accurate exposure degrees be determined. To exemplify this, peripheral nervus stimulation is a widely reported phenomena following exposure to MRI scanners ; nevertheless, current occupational exposure bounds such as those included in the EU Directive are based on limited grounds, some of which is non published in peer-reviewed diaries, and besides includes surveies on less well-established cognitive effects. Well-designed surveies are hence needed to accurately find exposure bounds and derive a greater penetration into effects observed, peculiarly with the newer high strength MRI systems.

Research into the effects of occupational exposure will be disputing since surveies of this nature conducted on human topics will evidently hold ethical deductions. However, epidemiology surveies affecting MRI workers would supply new informations on the effects of exposure on generative wellness and the effects of chronic exposure could be investigated by carry oning surveies among staff who have worked with MRU scanners for a figure of old ages. The small-scale surveies conducted to day of the month will besides go on to supply of import findings on exposure effects. Whilein vitrosurveies andin vivocarnal surveies can be utile, these types of surveies can non bring forth informations on exposure bounds in worlds.


Bonhomme-Faivre, L. , Marion, S. , Forestier, F. , Santini, R. , Auclair, H. 2003, ‘Effects of electromagnetic Fieldss on the immune systems of occupationally exposed

worlds and mice’ ,Archivess of Environmental Health, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 712–7.

Bourland, J. D. , Nyenhuls, J. A. , Schaefer, D. J. 1999, ‘Physiologic effects of intense MR imaging gradient fields’ ,Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 363–77.

Cavin, I. D. , Glover, P. M. , Bowtell, R. W. , Gowland, P. A. 2007, ‘Thresholds for comprehending metallic gustatory sensation at high magnetic field’ ,Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1357–61.

Cohen, M. S. , Weisskoff, R. M. , Rzedzian, R. R. , Kantor, H. L. 1990, ‘Sensory stimulation by time-varying electric fields’ ,Magnetic Resonance Medicine, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 409–14.

de Vocht, F. , Stevens, T. , Glover, P. , Sunderland, A. , Gowland, P, Krombout, H. 2007, ‘Cognitive effects of caput motions in stray Fieldss generated by a 7 Tesla whole-body MRI magnet’ ,Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 247–55.

de Vocht, F. , Stevens, T. , Glover, P. , Sunderland, A. , Gowland, P. , Krombout, H. 2006, ‘Acute neurobehavioral effects of exposure to inactive magnetic Fieldss: analyses of exposure-response relations’ ,Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 291–7.

de Vocht, F. , van-Wendel-de-Jode, B. , Engels, H. , Krombout, H. 2003, ‘Neurobehavioral effects among topics exposed to high inactive and gradient magnetic Fieldss from a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imagination system – a case-crossover pilot study’ ,Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 670–4.

European Union 2004, Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the minimal wellness and safety demands sing the exposure of workers to the hazards originating from physical agents ( electromagnetic Fieldss ) .Official Journal of the European Union, vol. L 159. Retrieved 13 September 2008 from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //

Franco, G, Perduri, R. Murolo, A. 2008, ‘Health effects of occupational exposure to inactive magnetic Fieldss used in magnetic resonance imagination: a review’ ,La Medicina del Lavoro, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 16–28.

Frese, G. & A ; Engels, H. 2003, ‘Magnetic resonance imagination ( MRI ) and electromagnetic Fieldss ( EMF ) ’ . Retrieved 13ThursdaySeptember 2008 from:

Glover, P. M. & A ; Bowtell, R. 2008, ’Measurement of electric Fieldss induced in a human topic due to natural motions in inactive magnetic Fieldss or exposure to jumping magnetic field gradients’ ,Physicss in Medicine and Biology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 361–73.

Glover, P. M. , Cavin, I. , Qian, W. , Bowtell, R. , Gowland, P. A. 2007, ‘Magnetic field–induced dizziness: a theoretical and experimental investigation’ ,Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 349–61.

Health and Safety Executive ( HSE ) 2007, Assessment of electromagnetic Fieldss around magnetic resonance imagination ( MRI ) equipment. Retrieved 13ThursdaySeptember 2008 from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //

Health Protection Agency 2008, Static magnetic Fieldss. Report of the independent consultative group on non-ionising radiation. Retrieved 13ThursdaySeptember 2008 from:

hypertext transfer protocol: // & A ; Page & A ; HPAwebAutoListName/Page/1207821636407? p=1207821636407

International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection ( ICNIRP ) 1998, ‘Guidelines for restricting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic Fieldss ( up to 300 GHz ) ’ ,Health Physicss, vol. 74, pp. 494–522.

Kanal, E. , Gillen, J. , Evans, J. A. , Savitz, D. A. , Shellock, F. G. 1993, ’Survey of generative wellness among female MR workers’ ,Radiology,vol. 187, no. 2, p. 395–9.

Keevil, S. F. , Gedroyc, W. , Gowland, P. , Hill, D. L. G. , Leach, M. O. , Ludman, C. N. , McLeish, K. , McRobbie, D. W. , Razavi, R. S. , Young, I. R. 2005, ‘Electromagnetic field exposure restriction and the hereafter of MRI’ ,The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 78, pp. 973–5.

Lauterbur, P. C. 1973, ‘Image formation by induced local interactions – illustrations using atomic magnetic resonance’ ,Nature, vol. 242, no. 5394, pp. 190–1.

Lovsund P, Oberg PA, Nilsson SE, Reuter T 1980, ‘Magnetophosphenes: a quantitative analysis of thresholds’ ,Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 18, no. 3. pp. 326–34.

Mansfield, P. & A ; Grannell, P. K. 1973, ‘NMR diffraction in solids’ ,Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 973–89.

National Radiological Protection Board ( NRPB ) 2004, ‘Documents of the NRPB 2004’ , vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–210.

Norton, S. J. 2003, ‘Can ultrasound be used to excite nervus tissue? ’ ,Biomedical Engineering Online. Retrieved 13ThursdaySeptember from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //

Patel, M. , Williamson, R. A. , Dorevitch, S. , Buchanan, S. 2008, ‘Pilot survey look intoing the consequence of the inactive magnetic field from a 9.4T MRI on the vestibular system’ ,Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 50, no. 5, p. 576–83.

Wealths, S. F. , Collins, D. J. , Scuffham, J. W. , Leach, M. O. 2007, ‘EU Directive 2004/40: field measurings of a 1.5 T clinical MR scanner’ ,British Journal of Radiology, vol. 80, no. 954, pp. 483–7.

Schlenck, J. F. 2005, ‘Physical interactions of inactive magnetic Fieldss with life tissues’ ,Advancement in Biophysicss and Molecular Biology, vol. 87, no. 2–3, pp. 185–204.

Shellock, F. G. & A ; Crues, J. V. 2004, ‘MR processs: biologic effects, safety, and patient care’ ,Radiology, vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 635–52.

Taoka, S. , Padmakumar, R. , Grissom, C. B. , Banerjee, R. 1997, ‘Magnetic field effects on coenzyme B12-dependent enzymes: proof of ethanolamine ammonium hydroxide lyase consequences and entension to human methylmalonyl CoA mutase’ ,Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 506–13.

Tuschl, H. , Neubauer, G. , Garn, H. , Duftschmid, K. , Winker, N. , Brusl, H. 1999, ‘Occupational exposure to high frequence electromagnetic Fieldss and its consequence on human immune parameters’ ,International Journal of Occupational and Medical Environmental Health, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 239–51.

World Health Organisation ( WHO ) 2006,Inactive Fieldss. Retrieved 13ThursdaySeptember 2008 from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //