Have To Be Good Manager To Be Effective Management Essay

The debut is the most of import thing in footings of Markss. Can you delight hold a expression at the debut and besides at the illustration in ruddy, because Im non certainly if it makes sense ; or you can set any illustration that you like. I should set many illustrations everyplace, but truly I lack of thoughts. Anyhow if you see the words, it should be maximal 1500 ; could you delight cut some pieces which you think that are repeats or irrelevant. At the minute the words are 1650 and I still have to compose about other two theories and give the decision. Could you delight give me some thoughts about the decision related to the rubric and the debut. I do n’t cognize how to give a decision. JAZAK ALLAH KHAIRAN FOR YOUR GREAT HELP.

It is a affair of great treatment nowadays whether good directors can be effectual leaders. An organisation needs both good direction and effectual leading to accomplish concern success, but in existent life it is difficult to happen person who has both. It is true that a good director demands to be an effectual leader, harmonizing to Pettinger ( 2001 ) , leading is one of the most of import assets of direction. However, leading itself is a accomplishment and non a profession. For illustration, the ex-Italian president Silvio Berlusconi was the leader of the state and of his political alliance, nevertheless, the twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours authorities managerial function was undertaken by his curate of economic system, Giulio Tremonti. On the other manus, Sergio Marchionne, the CEO of Fiat and Chrysler Motor companies, takes both an active leading and pull offing function in both companies. By holding leading accomplishments, it is possible to be a good director and an effectual leader at the same clip. In this essay I aim to give definitions of both leaders and directors every bit good as doing a clear differentiation between the two, followed by how the theory of leading has changed over clip, get downing from ‘leaders are born ‘ to ‘leaders can be made ‘ .

A director can be defined as ‘To manage is to calculate and be after, to form, to command, to organize and to command ‘ ( Fayol, 1916 ) and that ‘management is a societal process…the procedure consists of… planning, control, coordination and motive ‘ ( Brech, 1957 ) . Buckingham highlights the affair to be a good director as ‘there is one quality which distinguishes great directors from the remainder, they find out people strength and capitalise on it ‘ . On the other manus, ‘Leadership is the procedure in which an person influences other group members towards the attainment of group or organisational ends ‘ ( Shackleton, 1995 ) . Adair ( 2002 ) says that a good leader is person who people follow in good times every bit good as bad, because they are confident about his individual, his ability and cognition of his profession and because they matter to him.

Main Body

There is a significant difference between direction and leading, although some opinionists do state that they are diverse in construct but coincide significantly ( ed. Thomas, 2008 ) . John Kotter ( 1991 ) makes a clear differentiation between directors and leaders. He says that, while director thought is based on typical planning and budgeting, without invention or alterations, they develop abilities to accomplish programs by making an organisation construction and seting employees in them. By commanding and job work outing they guarantee the program is achieved.

On the other manus leaders bring alteration by repairing a vision in the hereafter along with schemes to convey the alterations needed to accomplish that end. They communicate new waies and make groups that understand the vision and strive to its accomplishment. They motivate and give a encouragement to people by fulfilling their human demands and do them experience an of import plus of the group.

After many surveies of directors and leaders were undertaken from all walks of life over clip, it was concluded that ‘there are three chief attacks to understanding leading, like waies meeting towards the mist-shrouded acme of a mountain: qualities, situational and functional. Each makes a critical part ‘ ( Adair, 2002 ) . Over clip, other leading theories had been introduced such as manner, transactional and transformational theories.

Traits and features of leading

The surveies of Classical Management were based on the fact that good directors were successful as a consequence of their personal qualities, therefore leading surveies were focused on personal qualities. Drucker ( 1955 ) said that there are no replacements for leading because of its absolute importance, it can non be created, taught or learned. Therefore, the earlier political orientation in leading was that leaders are born and can non be made. Harmonizing to Adair ( erectile dysfunction. Thomas, 2008 ) , the traits and features of leading are enthusiasm, unity, stamina, equity, heat and assurance.

Behavioural Theory

Traveling frontward in clip, it was discovered that the subject of leading, harmonizing to Cole ( 2004 ) , was a affair of specific behaviors of the leader at work instead than of personality, therefore beliing the Trait theory. Both direction and leading are involved in the behavioral manner theories. The chief difference was based on autocratic versus democratic manner and people versus undertaking oriented. One of the greatest subscribers of authoritarian-democratic manner is McGregor ( 1960 ) with his Theory X and Theory Y. The Theory X represents the autocratic director, sever, oppressive and does stiff controls with punishment-reward system. On the other manus, the Theory Y represents the democratic director, who is permissive and believes that workers can command themselves. This theory implies that a director can take to be autocratic or democratic, and that the ideal manner is the democratic 1. A disadvantage of this manner theory is that they pay attending to the leader ‘s behavior, pretermiting other elements such as importance of the undertaking, the internal state of affairs of the group and the abilities of the persons.

The people-task orientation is based on two variables, people and undertaking. Cole ( 2004 ) says that the Michigan Studies were analysed in 1950, based on the research of variables which distinguishes directors of high-productivity groups and directors of low-productivity groups. The consequence obtained was that the director of the high productiveness group was employee-oriented with more concern about relation at work, actuating workers to take part actively in determination devising and to be permissive. Conversely, low productiveness supervisor was more cognizant of the undertaking ‘s demand than the people satisfaction and with stiff way. In 1950 the Ohio surveies were conducted, refering leading behavior. The research was based on the Leader Behaviour Description Questionnaire ( LBDQ ) where two groups have been identified defined as ‘Consideration ‘ and ‘Initiating Structure ‘ . Consideration described the behavior as relationship-oriented. Originating Structure defines the behavior based on administration work procedure such as to put the undertaking and communicating channels.

Are leaders born or made?

Harmonizing to Pettinger ( 2001 ) unlike the spiritual leaders such as Jesus and Mohammed, leaders are made, non born. Some people have high leading accomplishments and qualities than others, nevertheless, they become effectual leaders by working on these. For illustration, Julius Caesar exerted his authorization for over 20 old ages, as a military leader, he ne’er asked his soldiers to make something that he was non ready to make himself.

Functional Theory

Harmonizing to Adair ( erectile dysfunction. Thomas, 2008 ) functional leading is concerned with the fact that leading is based more on appropriate behavior instead than personality of the leader. The functional theoretical account high spots the difference between consideration for persons from the consideration for groups and supports that effectual leading is what a leader does to accomplish the demands of the undertaking, the group and persons. To accomplish the common end is to run into the undertaking map. Group care map is to oversee the group and some activities such as team-building, give motive, subject and communicating. Individual care map is met by held activities such as development, motivation and fulfilling single demands. Each of these demands are mutualist between them. By accomplishing the undertaking, group and single demands are automatically satisfied. However, if group and single demands are non independently satisfied, so the undertaking demand will non be met. The best leaders are those who can equilibrate the three elements harmonizing to the demands of the state of affairs.

Contingency theory

In Pettinger ‘s ( 2001 ) position, leading sees its development in the Contingency attack, which argues that the traits and the behavior of a leader depends widely on the on the job environment. Harmonizing to Fiedler ( 1967 ) the leader determines the group public presentation by following an accurate manner sing the comparative advantage of the state of affairs. The variables which find the advantage of the state of affairs are relationship between leader and worker, degree of construction in the undertaking and power of the place. Eight likely combination of state of affairss can be determined from the three variables, which consequences in a favorable leader when leader-follower relation is good, the undertaking is good structured and he has an autocratic place. Contrarily, the leader is less favorable when is non liked from the workers, the undertaking is ill structured and he has a weak place.

Transactional and transformational

Harmonizing to Bertocci ( 2009 ) the alterations of demands in organisations and the trouble to get by with these alterations were high. As a consequence of this, the Transactional and Transformational leading theories were introduced. Both theories are relationship and way end based leading behavior. In George and Jones ( 2009 ) point of position, transactional leader is person who motivates the workers by honoring them for high public presentation or call on the carpeting them for higher efficiency. For illustration, the employee has to increase gross revenues to acquire a higher salary, cut down cost to obtain fillips or to increase the work measure to accomplish publicities. Bertocci ( 2009 ) supports that a transformational leader is a individual who motivates followings to obtain a better consequence than what was expected. This ability is the consequence of three personalities of the leader such as personal appeal, single attending and rational state of affairs.

Conclusion is merely a really short sum-up of whatever you already discussed in the essay. You can get down like this: ‘In decision, it has been shown that to be a good director, you need to be an effectual leader. Initial theories had suggested that leaders are born and can non be made hence, directors need to be per se good leaders, nevertheless, this theory is clearly outdated and newer surveies show that in both direction and leading the manner is an facet of behavior at work. After farther researches, it was discovered that the traits and behavior of a leader depends on widely on the environment. As Pettinger ( 2001 ) says, leading is a practical plus of the managerial map, as a consequence of this, it is of import that it is learned, developed and applied. All leaders-managers or viceversa, must hold authorization, influence and followings.